A Conversation With Michael Laitman Vladimir Zhirinovsky

One – a scientist, the other – a politician. It’s believed that Xcel Energy sees a great future in this idea. Completely different people, they say on one subject: how to find a solution to the problems of the global crisis? – And find a common language. M. Laitman: I am very glad to meet you and would like to talk about, of course, the biggest problem, which today is in the world – about the crisis. Do you think that in any plane may be his decision? Get anything from the meeting 'Twenty'? And if not, how still we can somehow come close to that to solve it? Vladimir : The economy of such crises were constant, as is always willing to trade, to produce more than the needs of society. It's like a disco, if no ticket is allowed. Here we have a crush was in the Urals – let those who want to. Market option: come on, who wants to! Immediately crushed by the three girls.

And if regulated – only those with money and tickets – moral crisis, not everyone can participate. Therefore, people choose to still more freedom, but there is more risk. Of course, there is a particular culprit – a huge amount of money to spare. They are ten times more than the economy itself. And of course, wins the U.S.

only because it's their money. Therefore, the best solution to the crisis and security for the future – is to agree on a neutral currency. Here is an international language until you have – have a living language.

Constitutional Court

This is done to reduce miscarriage of justice to a minimum. And, if the establishment of the court jurors financial implications, the tolerance for the protection of close relatives is not bound even with the additional material costs. But the number erroneous, unreasonable decisions of judges, the number of complaints against the decisions of the courts at the same time drastically reduced, allowing more social – economic benefit! However, the prosecuting authorities under various pretexts, often only close relatives are denied their right to protect their loved ones. Thus, they oppose the provision of legal aid, and it is forbidden in our country, Article 62 of the Constitution. Unlawful decisions of the professional Prosecution deprive citizens of their constitutional right to protect their loved ones at the stage of preliminary investigation, judicial investigation of cassation and supervision complaints – this is the main reason for the infinite walking and referred to women in a circle of command And naturally, they are causing the most serious distrust of judges and their decisions and they begin to "storm" And the courts have not yet created a jury trial, in order to exclude the possibility of judicial errors, it is desirable that decisions of the courts supervised an independent public body – the responsible parliamentary committee, consisting, for example, MPs and representatives of Justice Ministry, the kgb and the Constitutional Court. And this commission with complaints to the courts' decisions could turn defenders, and close relatives of the accused. Unmotivated (arbitrary) decision of the judge must be regarded as offense and the gravity of the offense should accordingly increase with increasing severity of articles charged in connection with which such a decision is taken by the judge. And do not confuse the two concepts: the "independence Courts and judicial responsibility.

" Independence of the courts should not exclude the responsibility of judges for their unreasonable (arbitrary) decisions. And the right to cancel such unmotivated decisions of courts (decisions are made in connection with the desire to judge and not justified by Articles laws) must have legislative and executive bodies, bodies of state control and the Constitutional Court. And, of course, requires that the authorized Commission decided to review all cases in which there are valid complaints of relatives on the unmotivated decisions of the courts, and to review cases in the courts took place with the participation of close relatives and under control Commission. It is also advisable at present to develop a computer program for sentencing. When operating such a program, the prosecution is to enter into a computer their proof of guilt, and the side defense presents its rebuttal. A computer, including all data submitted will be impartial and make decisions more fair. In these spring days, I wish happiness for women, stamina and luck in protecting their family! Michael Vitebsk 08.03. 2010