Many hair dryer only “poor” that means really good expensive only in some cases, the Stiftung Warentest has determined after researching different models of hair dryers. Mitchel Resnick may not feel the same. Although the winner was the most expensive object at the same time, other hair of the higher price range had significant shortcomings. What devices at an online auction, care must be taken and whether the many integrated ion technology keeps what it promises, reveals the auction Portal auvito.de. Without hesitation Marcus explained all about the problem. No reason to worry about the top model Satinpro supplied satin 2200 of Brown manufacturer’s information. Despite the comparatively high price of 60 Euro, this hair dryer is each purchase value. As one test object, it dries the hair “very good” and equally protects it with a relatively low degree of heat.
Quite the contrary to the ELTA Germany HT352, which mercilessly flunked the test. After a short time of usage it came to short circuit and the unit completely burnt out. This is the hair dryer with the CE and GS safety mark. The 50-euro model of VIP Hairdresser Udo Walz and the hair dryer by Panasonic for 39 Euro disappointed with the test results ‘poor’, which was made on the basis of technical imperfections and massive security shortcomings. The device of the celebrity hairdresser due to its unwieldy belongs rather in a hairdressing salon as the domestic bathroom according to the unanimous opinion of the test subjects. Examiners of household appliances were regards the ion technology, however, disagreed. While in the lab no significant differences in the final notice, the test persons swarmed with damaged hair noticeably softer waves.