Example: (you know someone? – Not deeply, but I have some information of third on it). Then pass to use the correct term that would be: discrimination, exclusion, separation; distinction; discernment. Racial discrimination, diverse treatment given the people of different races; segregation. Example: You can not agree to the practical homosexual, but from the moment that you take attitude of separation, exclusion arriving to insult or any another type of offensive attitude, she starts to be discrimination. We cannot accept the discrimination of people, but its attitudes and preferences can and must be contested. We have the right not to agree to opinions or diverse preferences and not to be obliged to swallow ' ' throat abaixo' ' the attitudes that are called as modernity and freedom.
A thing is to more recognize a society in fact between two people or, is men, women or any sexual preference. Nothing more just of what, financial cooperation of both will be had the parts, respected being the allotment of proportional good to its investments. Another thing it is to recognize that a man can be transformed into woman in a pass of vice magician and turns, and, to assume a couple situation. But let us leave of side this question and let us come back toward most important that it is the freedom. This emblematic phrase of So Paulo synthecizes well its meaning very and calls attention for its possible consequncias ' ' everything is allowed to it, but nor everything it convm' ' (ICor 10, 23). Day of these I witnessed a quarrel in a program of television on sexual freedom e, certain man, by the way, that it does not want plus this heading, said that he was married has some years and that it had two children.
A beautiful day decided to follow its sexual preference that the freedom propitiated to it. It abandoned the family, it made some surgical interventions of seios and ndegas to feel a true woman and was to live with another man, if thus we can also intitle it. Then, to the asked being if to its they saw it children in the street as it would like to be treated: ' ' There he is my father? ' ' its friends they would say to it: ' ' As thus, it is certain, she would not be its me' '? the boy would answer: ' ' Therefore it is It now discovered that he wants to be woman! Everything very normal, you does not find? Modern times! ' ' The friends had not known what to answer. It is not a moralista speech, therefore all we, at some moment of our lives, travel in our imagination and sexual fancies, but we cannot pass of mere will, and as my mother says: ' ' will is thing that of and passa' ' , and it must pass, therefore we must reflect on the consequncias that these acts can cause we and the all social context in which we are inserted. If you are not convinced, visit Salman Behbehani. Freedom is very good and a ptrio-sacred right, but when we know to use it. Alvaro Martins Arsenio May 2011.