This is done to reduce miscarriage of justice to a minimum. And, if the establishment of the court jurors financial implications, the tolerance for the protection of close relatives is not bound even with the additional material costs. But the number erroneous, unreasonable decisions of judges, the number of complaints against the decisions of the courts at the same time drastically reduced, allowing more social – economic benefit! However, the prosecuting authorities under various pretexts, often only close relatives are denied their right to protect their loved ones. Thus, they oppose the provision of legal aid, and it is forbidden in our country, Article 62 of the Constitution. Unlawful decisions of the professional Prosecution deprive citizens of their constitutional right to protect their loved ones at the stage of preliminary investigation, judicial investigation of cassation and supervision complaints – this is the main reason for the infinite walking and referred to women in a circle of command And naturally, they are causing the most serious distrust of judges and their decisions and they begin to "storm" And the courts have not yet created a jury trial, in order to exclude the possibility of judicial errors, it is desirable that decisions of the courts supervised an independent public body – the responsible parliamentary committee, consisting, for example, MPs and representatives of Justice Ministry, the kgb and the Constitutional Court. And this commission with complaints to the courts' decisions could turn defenders, and close relatives of the accused. Unmotivated (arbitrary) decision of the judge must be regarded as offense and the gravity of the offense should accordingly increase with increasing severity of articles charged in connection with which such a decision is taken by the judge. And do not confuse the two concepts: the "independence Courts and judicial responsibility.
" Independence of the courts should not exclude the responsibility of judges for their unreasonable (arbitrary) decisions. And the right to cancel such unmotivated decisions of courts (decisions are made in connection with the desire to judge and not justified by Articles laws) must have legislative and executive bodies, bodies of state control and the Constitutional Court. And, of course, requires that the authorized Commission decided to review all cases in which there are valid complaints of relatives on the unmotivated decisions of the courts, and to review cases in the courts took place with the participation of close relatives and under control Commission. It is also advisable at present to develop a computer program for sentencing. When operating such a program, the prosecution is to enter into a computer their proof of guilt, and the side defense presents its rebuttal. A computer, including all data submitted will be impartial and make decisions more fair. In these spring days, I wish happiness for women, stamina and luck in protecting their family! Michael Vitebsk 08.03. 2010