International Professional Fight Tournament II Super Pro

Posted on by JamesH

Vanguard costume. " The team led by Elena Vasilyevna Lukaszewicz – Doctor of Philology, professor, head. Department of Theory and Practice Communications of the Altai State University, Barnaul. It consists of: Bryleva Olga, Bugorskaya Nadine Hussar Elena G., Natalia Kuznetsova, Marina Frolov N. – authors of training programs for researchers and teachers of public educational institutions of higher and further education "teacher in the Image corporate culture of the university. " Svetlakova Valentina Pavlovna – PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor of General and Educational Psychology at Omsk State Pedagogical University – author textbook, "Psychology of the image." Kovtunova Olga Matveyevna – Ph.D., assistant professor of social pedagogy, Ural State Pedagogical University and Kovtunova Alla N. – candidate ped. Sciences, associate professor of history and theory of social work, Ural State Pedagogical University – authors of educational tools PR-Imidzhmeyking in social work." Obolensky Svetlana – candidate.

Chemical Sciences, the artist – the author of jewelry collection, "The Art of IVF." Kostylev Alex G. – Director of the NGO Fight Club "Bison", the Mariupol, Ukraine – The author of the promotion of the International Professional Fight Tournament II Super Pro -2008, the Chulanova Oksana L. – candidate. ped. , Associate Professor, Head of External Studies Surgut State University – author of the project "Improving the image of the Airline" UTair "in re-branding and quality systems." The team, consisting of Elena Orlova A. – doctor of psychological Sciences, professor, academician of the PAM; Kozyakova Roman Valerievich – candidate. Psychology. Sciences, corresponding member of AIM and Mokrova Roman Valentinovich – a member of the Creative Union of Artists – the authors of the project "The image of the youth of the New Russia." Zhebit Vladimir – PhD Psychology.

Sciences, corresponding member of AIM, a member of the Physics Institute of the Physics Institute, RAS (FIAN) – author of the promotion of innovation Physics Institute of the Physics Institute, RAS (FIAN). Tatiana Makarova – Ph.D., assistant professor of design of the Moscow financial-industrial academy, a corresponding member of AIM – author of the project progress Fashion House ICON. The team headed by Yuri Chernyshov IG – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head. Department of General History and International Relations, ASU – author of the organization International scientific conference "Modern Russia and the world: an alternative to development (the role of Russian regions in shaping the image of the country). Dushenkina Elena – International student Academy of Business and Management – author of "Corporate image: a theory of practice" in the magazine "Corporate imageology", 2008. Congratulating the awardees, the President of the Academy imageology, doctor of psychological sciences, professor Elena A. Petrova hoped that the competition in the future will be more popular and interesting to a wider audience. She reported that this year at the initiative of the Director of the Institute of Policy Vitaly image Valentinovitch Trubnikov instituted another award of the contest, called "Antiimidzh." For this category Tabachkova artist Nikolai, a member of the International Union of Designers (author of the main prize of the contest) is made A special figurine. But for her to call his anti-hero award to the public. To do this, anyone can take part in the vote to be held at the site of the Academy imageology the end of 2009. The voting results will be announced at the awards ceremony of the contest "The image directory of 2010."

Constitutional Court

Posted on by JamesH

This is done to reduce miscarriage of justice to a minimum. And, if the establishment of the court jurors financial implications, the tolerance for the protection of close relatives is not bound even with the additional material costs. But the number erroneous, unreasonable decisions of judges, the number of complaints against the decisions of the courts at the same time drastically reduced, allowing more social – economic benefit! However, the prosecuting authorities under various pretexts, often only close relatives are denied their right to protect their loved ones. Thus, they oppose the provision of legal aid, and it is forbidden in our country, Article 62 of the Constitution. Unlawful decisions of the professional Prosecution deprive citizens of their constitutional right to protect their loved ones at the stage of preliminary investigation, judicial investigation of cassation and supervision complaints – this is the main reason for the infinite walking and referred to women in a circle of command And naturally, they are causing the most serious distrust of judges and their decisions and they begin to "storm" And the courts have not yet created a jury trial, in order to exclude the possibility of judicial errors, it is desirable that decisions of the courts supervised an independent public body – the responsible parliamentary committee, consisting, for example, MPs and representatives of Justice Ministry, the kgb and the Constitutional Court. And this commission with complaints to the courts' decisions could turn defenders, and close relatives of the accused. Unmotivated (arbitrary) decision of the judge must be regarded as offense and the gravity of the offense should accordingly increase with increasing severity of articles charged in connection with which such a decision is taken by the judge. And do not confuse the two concepts: the "independence Courts and judicial responsibility.

" Independence of the courts should not exclude the responsibility of judges for their unreasonable (arbitrary) decisions. And the right to cancel such unmotivated decisions of courts (decisions are made in connection with the desire to judge and not justified by Articles laws) must have legislative and executive bodies, bodies of state control and the Constitutional Court. And, of course, requires that the authorized Commission decided to review all cases in which there are valid complaints of relatives on the unmotivated decisions of the courts, and to review cases in the courts took place with the participation of close relatives and under control Commission. It is also advisable at present to develop a computer program for sentencing. When operating such a program, the prosecution is to enter into a computer their proof of guilt, and the side defense presents its rebuttal. A computer, including all data submitted will be impartial and make decisions more fair. In these spring days, I wish happiness for women, stamina and luck in protecting their family! Michael Vitebsk 08.03. 2010