The conflict between the two countries could erupt in the Barents Sea, which is considered a major place of origin of fish and seafood, for America and for Russia. U.S. and Russian pollock catches here is the bulk of fish catches in the world. But global warming shifts the location of fishing, thereby leading to conflict of interest fishing industries of both countries, as pollock in gradually moving northward into Russian territorial waters. Every summer, the fish moves from the warmer waters of the Aleutian Islands in the more cool waters off the coast of Russia. Scientists have already proved that in the Northern Hemisphere fish moves toward the North Pole in two to three times faster than animals on land. Experts on fishing fear that such movements may lead to a new burst of controversy, reminding cod war 50's and 70's, when fishermen protaranivali ships competitors cut their networks and engage in a gunfight with one another. In the east Mediterranean rapidly declining level of biodiversity that started in the 70's of last century, the reduction of biodiversity in the humid areas of the eastern Mediterranean Sea continues at an accelerated pace and in our time. The program MedWet, dedicated to the conservation of Mediterranean wet areas (lakes, swamps), scientists have studied the Eastern Mediterranean (Israel, Lebanon, Cyprus, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Turkey, Greece and the Balkan countries), and concluded that the numbers of some species, habitats which hitherto were in the eastern Mediterranean, fell significantly in the late 20 th century.
The truth for the sake of truth itself is not a necessity for all biologists and philosophers in Yellowstone, they want the truth for the sake of Yellowstone – regardless of how it affects their careers. If philosophy of biology can not find this objective care anywhere else in biology, they should visit Yellowstone. First cheyzovsky search exactly, he leaves the wilderness to fight for its preservation. He claims that he devotes his career Yellowstone. But, alas, it loses its way. He ceases to respect the naturalists who are also fond of Yellowstone.
As a result, it is unclear whether there is in fact Chase in environmental ethics, he despises almost all of biology and philosophy. He opposed to granting the nature of freedom and for the full scientific management as if it's ethics, which appreciates nature. He does not trust the naturalists, but worst of all, he does not trust nature itself. In Yellowstone, as but elsewhere, managerial control – it is not love, biology, and philosophy here should be taught how to appreciate, rather than manipulate. Healing, heals love is what you need, and then letting nature on its way to the appropriate form of care for the bears, elk, ecosystem, land of the wild.